The Race To The White House

Donald Trump winning the presidential elections has shocked many people around the world. Especially people who are in the business of calling the shots in the elections are startled by the results. Most of them predicted that Hillary would win and walk away with the title as “The President”. Well, sadly all of them had predicted it wrong except Allan Lichtman.

Allan Lichtman is a historian working at the American University and he was the first to declare that Donald Trump would will the elections. Even during the final weeks of the campaign. Lichtman stuck to his predictions. He based his predictions according to a set of 13 questions that have been designed in the true or false format. These questions gauged the performance of the party that was holding the White House.

According to Lichtman, elections are a judgement of the government’s governance skills. The drama of the rest of the election season virtually has no meaning. He also said that people do not count for the twists and turns, the speeches, debates and other campaign tricks.

The coverage by the media about the elections resembles that of a horse race. The deciding factor is who has had a good day and who hasn’t. The pollsters end up making money by keeping tabs on the horse race as to who is ahead and who is ranking behind. The fact that it is dealt with in this manner makes it misleading.

Lichtman has been successful in predicting the winners for the ninth time in a row. He hopes that this makes people rethink about the way election and politics are looked at. He hopes that in near future, politics, history and governance is brought together before making their decision to vote and not based on the media hype surrounding the elections.

Read Also: Best Countries To Start Your Business

Best Countries To Start Your Business

Starting business takes a lot of effort. Apart from the expertise and the funds that is required to start the business, legal approvals or approvals from various officials in each country is important too. These rules for approving a business opportunity varies from country to country. In countries such as New Zealand, it takes a day to get an approval whereas in Venezuela it takes 230 days. The stark difference is alarming. Due to this, New Zealand remains as the easiest country to start your business in and Venezuela being the toughest.

According to the survey that was conducted by World Bank, it has been estimated that New Zealand has taken the top spot in the rankings being the easiest place on the planet to do business and Venezuela has ranked 187th out of the 190 economies. New Zealand has gone past Singapore which was holding the top rank for the past decade.

Some of the indicators that the World Bank was looking at was starting a business, permits with respect to construction, property registration and the facility to avail credit. United States ranked down from the overall table into the eight position from the long standing seventh. However, it was ranked high for getting credit and the way they deal with firms that are insolvent.

Although United States ranked top on some categories, the overall rating for the country is at 51st place. Due to the recent economic reforms, three countries have improved in their business side. They are Brunei, Kazakhstan and Kenya. Somalia is the worst economy according to the survey. The war that has been launched against most of the east African nations has pushed their rank under paying taxes to the bottom. In fact Somalia has no tax system in place which leads to limited protection for minority investors.

Some of the other nations that has ranked in the top ten category are: New Zealand, Singapore, Denmark, Hong Kong, South Korea, Norway, United Kingdom, United States, Sweden and Macedonia.

Read Also: Truth About Couple Food Economy

Truth About Couple Food Economy

Marriage counselors have said that couples end up tying the knot without talking about the core factors that seal or break the marriage. Topics such as finances, children and religion must be added to these core factors. Apart from this, dining at a restaurant should be added to the list.

The fact that most people do not discuss restaurant dining is not surprising. What’s surprising is that many of them do not even have dining together as a concept in their relationship even after being with the same person for about 10 to 20 years. This habit adds stress to the relationship or the couples do not go for good dining experiences.

There are four strategies that are important when dining out.

Autarky
When a country has closed itself to imports or exports, it produces everything that is needed for consumption. At a restaurant you get to decide what you would like to eat without any input from the other person. This makes independent decision making possible. There is no room for the other person to eat what you ordered.

Individual Production With Trade
In this method, after placing individual orders, you allow the other person to share in exchange to few bites of their food. This is kind fo similar to the way world economy works. This is a good method since you don’t have to end up eating the same dish throughout the mean and end up unsatisfied.

Individual Rights With An Option To Trade
In this method, we are moving towards a more central economy. If both the parties consult and decide on a central basis about the food, it is the sign of a central economy. If there is indecision, then couple can opt for trading their dishes.

Full On Food Communism
This is not such a good idea. In this experience, everything that is ordered is shared. Therefore, anything bought will be shared equally among both the individuals. To practice this method, you require good knowledge of your partner.

Read Also: Weather News in US (BBC)